174
noijaloosaa BNINO
.OIRI Yaurel Har
♦កដ
Mal to "Love) · Loy to sqlsoon ogbalvondon of ged I
.1000 80\0962.0% 、0JIN
Jib Bird no "odiofob worü edt to etunim edil
.963JL100 ein: gd bled owelv end becuenqxe noidnevno)
sind d 80! I rednejqea ‡VI no neddiw nejjel siff
nobelenggkale e neõrus jnez yintataso saw noljaisumaÁ
1. noideneblanos 19.sw nerid J'isti erfo to grinses ers of aa
od hebrooo add a noijoejong jarit bumuang asv ji
and foldy to yntropoda al ferstelyor afism deorij
ed od ball extrem est. Jønt
Sow Jremialo
8
.Joeldun a
®'ydoq qoids/tinoo duit keddo arid ul beneJ ́Î8oz
a foun derið að/quorit quo od 1gienot on saw ool110
.seddierou sidi ta eredeam add og berwo00 even 01 807
-ПONASI DIts Jeul vino sit Jant estelo moljaicoBRÁ BINT
one yd Bobslugosen & si noiJnaup erta to noítulos alca
zoing Jord sig omtug end to snido ni atwcu ziweno)
neended as girenenwo to drigin offð reðudldenGO GAU
.ceitung entjoestnoo did cwd end to adoeldue
Heli 1 benistdo ed Jata nofdpedong to erurben emo2
ylaviJooqaca qnodemoli tre brunigrid ni bereteigen afnem
-requel y yo, alq riott bejoutong anew anido el boar hre
bekroona od bluou noddoodong anodeı mi .exido ni exe
iftod row brin,neqet at boredeigen edinm ekorteqat of
sbiseb hinco eniro ni eau roinq ben deizen enew exnko
.Juloq erit
.I
.9
1900
4.
5.
The following remarks on the Draft Convention bear out
in detail the conclusione atated above.
ARTICLE I. The first paragraph is to the minds of
members of this Association wrong in principle and
should be amended as indicated in Par 3 of this letter
if British and Hongkong merchants are to find it of
any value.
Apart from the wrong principle involved
cases are bound to occur of British marks used
exclusively in China being forestalled, quite possibly
in good faith, on the Japanese register by marks used
for Japan by Japanese. These British marke can have
no protection under the Convention even as it stands.
The second paragraph, if amended to include
the words "whether registered or not", and also stated
separately as a second article, would afford a measure
The wording
of protection and thus might prove useful.
might preferably be altered to "The provisions..
Trade Marks shall cover" eta.
ARTICLE II is acceptable.
ARTICLE III, if merely to elucidate the word "Subject", cannot be objected to, but in another sense is dealt
with in Par 5 of this letter.
ARTICLE IV is unintelligible on the grounds ainuted by
the Crown Solicitor.
Some doubt is felt as to whether the Convention as
it atande necessitates Japanese subjects registering
in England or if it will be allowable for them to register in Hongkong, Canada, or other British Colonies. In either case the state of affairs will be
It will be open for adverse to Hangkong merchants.
Japanese to register in London marks they know emanate
from
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.